I have been hearing the news of the nurse afflicted with ebola as a result of her self sacrificial love, and wondering what will be the effect of my simple prayer for her recovery. I know that at the twinkling of the eye He CAN restore her to perfect health - but why should He? Sometimes, when He cured people, He told them NOT to spread the word around - but the only purpose of curing them was, surely, to show that He had the power? But He doesn't need to show me - I know already; is it to show the wider world? Is it a case of the more the merrier? I often reflect on the war, the way the King on half a dozen occasions called the Nation to prayer, and every occasion was followed by what I call a miracle but which some might call an unnatural happening. Was it because so many people joined together? Probably not - God has said that, if you don't do it for Love it is worthless, so the numbers don't matter, it's the motive that does. All over the World people, out of love, are praying for her - Thy Will be done.
Saturday, 3 January 2015
Monday, 1 December 2014
The early Church
Thinking about people driven out of the Church because they cannot cope with female bishops or gay priests (of either sex).
Our Sermon on Sunday touched on “Follow me! and they did“. I thought - how many of us, approached by a stranger who said “Follow me!” would leave friends and family and do just that? Then I wondered what Jesus wanted of them and I assumed it was to wander with Him, listening to His message, so that when the time came they could pass it on. And it was a simple message of love - love God, love your neighbour - amplified in the Sermon on the Mount. So that was the whole doctrine of the church of Christ. But then men took over - from Constantine onwards - and more and more “rules” were added until it became just like the church Jesus had left. Then what happens? Schism. Does the Holy Spirit proceed from the Father only, or from the Father and the Son? How earth-shattering is that? “What would Jesus say?” No one asked, I suspect. But it was enough to split the church. Then came the adoration of Mary, the Doctrine of Transubstantiation, the Infallibility of the Church....and so it goes on. Why does the Church need infallibility - unless they keep moving the goalposts? Inevitably one keeps coming back to “What would Jesus do?” and the answer must be “nothing” - He set out the Rules of Salvation during his lifetime and He would say - “Don’t waste your time arguing on these matters - just concentrate on MY message”. I see the Church as a giant tree with Jesus Himself as the trunk and branches sticking out from it, all valid in the eyes of God, whatever their procedures, so long as they follow the original commandments. No-one is "driven out" - they just chose to go, to follow the path which, for them, is most comfortable.
Thinking about people driven out of the Church because they cannot cope with female bishops or gay priests (of either sex).
Our Sermon on Sunday touched on “Follow me! and they did“. I thought - how many of us, approached by a stranger who said “Follow me!” would leave friends and family and do just that? Then I wondered what Jesus wanted of them and I assumed it was to wander with Him, listening to His message, so that when the time came they could pass it on. And it was a simple message of love - love God, love your neighbour - amplified in the Sermon on the Mount. So that was the whole doctrine of the church of Christ. But then men took over - from Constantine onwards - and more and more “rules” were added until it became just like the church Jesus had left. Then what happens? Schism. Does the Holy Spirit proceed from the Father only, or from the Father and the Son? How earth-shattering is that? “What would Jesus say?” No one asked, I suspect. But it was enough to split the church. Then came the adoration of Mary, the Doctrine of Transubstantiation, the Infallibility of the Church....and so it goes on. Why does the Church need infallibility - unless they keep moving the goalposts? Inevitably one keeps coming back to “What would Jesus do?” and the answer must be “nothing” - He set out the Rules of Salvation during his lifetime and He would say - “Don’t waste your time arguing on these matters - just concentrate on MY message”. I see the Church as a giant tree with Jesus Himself as the trunk and branches sticking out from it, all valid in the eyes of God, whatever their procedures, so long as they follow the original commandments. No-one is "driven out" - they just chose to go, to follow the path which, for them, is most comfortable.
Tuesday, 29 April 2014
Nostalgia
When my first grandchildren - a boy and a girl - were small, they often came to stay with us and I used to say bedtime prayers with them. I would kneel between the beds, take a hand each, and off we would go. Of course, they were over excited, so to calm them down I would pretend we were on the telephone to God but the line was engaged: while we were waiting we would say a Hail Mary and Oh Sacred Heart (they were Roman Catholics) and then, when Jesus was free, we would start on everyday prayers - from our usual Grace - “Thank you Jesus for my food, I hope you’ll help me to be good” to “God bless Mummy & Daddy etc etc etc" until we had covered everybody we could possibly imagine....and anyone we had overlooked. By then, they were fast asleep, and I would creep out, knowing that they were in safe hands. I once submitted a narrative like this to our then Parish Magazine and was roundly told off by the Rural Dean for suggesting that Jesus might have been too busy to listen at first; but as the RC magazine had published it without demur I told the Dean to get lost. I think I said “lost”.
Monday, 20 January 2014
WEEK OF PRAYER FOR CHRISTIAN UNITY
For me - an Anglican - the main differences between the Church of England and the Church of Rome have been resolved, but one remains and can never be resolved by negotiation: either you are capable of looking at a piece of bread and truly believing that it has changed and is really Christ Himself, or you are not. No amount of discussion can change that: if you can, worshipping the Host is not only a pleasure, but a duty; if you cannot, it is idolatry. So I think movement towards the sort of unity for which Christ prayed - “that you all may be one in the same way that My Father and I are one” - has for years been tackled on the wrong basis. Because of the Roman doctrine of infallability Pope Francis cannot change their stance but he could announce that all who believe that, at Holy Communion, all who believe that they are replicating Christ’s commandment “Do this in remembrance of Me” are welcome, would be a powerful move in the right direction.
For me - an Anglican - the main differences between the Church of England and the Church of Rome have been resolved, but one remains and can never be resolved by negotiation: either you are capable of looking at a piece of bread and truly believing that it has changed and is really Christ Himself, or you are not. No amount of discussion can change that: if you can, worshipping the Host is not only a pleasure, but a duty; if you cannot, it is idolatry. So I think movement towards the sort of unity for which Christ prayed - “that you all may be one in the same way that My Father and I are one” - has for years been tackled on the wrong basis. Because of the Roman doctrine of infallability Pope Francis cannot change their stance but he could announce that all who believe that, at Holy Communion, all who believe that they are replicating Christ’s commandment “Do this in remembrance of Me” are welcome, would be a powerful move in the right direction.
Sunday, 5 January 2014
Pope Francis
Before the Conclave to elect a new Pope, the Cardinals have several meetings, not to canvass support - that is not permitted - but to exchange views. They can be joined by the older Cardinals who are not allowed to vote but can offer guidance. I was interested to learn that at one of these get-togethers Cardinal Bergoglio made a short speech which included the following: “When Jesus said ‘Behold I stand at the door and knock’ people assumed He was outside, wanting to come in. But sometimes Jesus knocks from within, wanting to be let out into the wider world.” This sentiment sounded familiar - where had I heard it before? Then I remembered! My blog of 2nd May 2011 when I recounted my encounter with John Paul II and ‘saw’ Jesus - “ here He was, trapped in all the ceremonial of the Church of Rome when He wanted to be out among His people.” Welcome, Pope Francis.
Friday, 30 August 2013
Guardian Angels
I was going to begin by saying “My theology is a bit dodgy”.- then I thought I should delete “a bit”. But I have been thinking today, 30 August, about my sister Muriel. She died long before I was born but she was a child of my parents so I rate her as my sister. Born prematurely on 29 August 1917 she died the next day. I think she was baptised so by my reckoning she died blameless and went straight to Heaven. (That’s another one of my quirks - I beam with pleasure at the Absolution because I believe that, at that point - for a split second - I, too, am blameless and my future is assured). The dodgy bit comes in because I truly believe in Guardian Angels and I like to think that Muriel is mine. I cannot number the times I have dodged death and I thank God for her. It may all be nonsense but it comforts me and I don’t think any harm is done by it: I even ask her to desert me from time to time in favour of someone I know whose need is greater. So RIP, dear sister, until we meet........
Wednesday, 27 February 2013
Christian Unity
Cardinal O’Brien [Scotland] ‘thought the unthinkable’ - that the Church of Rome should consider allowing priests to marry. That set me thinking about the Articles of the Church of England. In almost all of them, the Roman branch of our Church has now come up to scratch: that still leaves Article XXV that "the Sacraments were not ordained of Christ to be gazed upon, or to be carried about, but that we should duly use Them.”. The idea that you should worship the piece of bread taken by the priest was anathema to the Protestant reformers: the Roman doctrine that it was no longer a piece of bread because the priest had converted it to Christ Himself was just not credible - all one’s senses confirmed it was not so. Alas, the next Pope can do nothing about that. because it has been declared to be part of the infallible doctrine of his church What he could do, though, would be to acknowledge that this need not be an obstacle to inter-communion - that all who believe that in the Eucharist they are replicating the Last Supper should be allowed to sup at the same table - which would give an enormous fillip to the one, holy, catholic and apostolic church which currently faces an enormous challenge from Satan. So we must all pray WITH CONFIDENCE that the Holy Spirit will guide the cardinals in their deliberations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)